the next issue of the sozusagen is coming in the winter semester 2018/19 and we are looking for your contributions! The topic of the upcoming issue is “Body · Sexuality · Love”. You can be inspired by one, two or all three terms.
Whether body, sexuality or love, all three play central roles in “society”. Their effect can be observed in many aspects of social interaction: access to buildings or occupations, life expectancy, the risk of illness, identity(s) or life planning. This list can easily be continued.
Which normative expectations are placed on our body, on our sexuality or on love? Who am I? What makes a person a person? Who decides what happens to a person’s body? What is love and where does love begin? What significance does love have in society? Does the body, sexuality and love inevitably belong together or do they exist independently of each other? Would sexuality or love be imaginable without a body? How important is the body in the digital world? What would I be without my body? What would my body be without me?
We welcome any kind of contribution, including scientific essays, contributions from university groups, book reviews, poems, comics and cartoons. And also anything else that you can think of. You can write in German as well as in English. Depending on the format you want to submit, the desired number of words varies. For example, we are looking for essays with about 1750 words. Please submit your first draft by the 2nd of July, 2018.
If the topic does not appeal to you or if you would like to submit contributions on (completely) different subject areas, we also look forward to receiving these submissions for the upcoming issue!
Please send us your first draft by e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org). Also send us an e-mail if you have any questions or ideas!
Guidelines for contributions in sozusagen
All contributions should use non-discriminatory language that is gender inclusive. This means writing both female and male pronouns (“he” and “she” or a neutral pronoun such as “they”).
Citations and references
Please the American Sociological Association (ASA) style for citing sources and referencing.
When there are two authors name both authors. If there are three authors, name all three the first time you cite them. For all following citations use the first name and et al.
Multiple citations are separated with a semicolon. You can choose whether to sort the references by date or alphabetically as long as you are consistent.
|One author||(Author Year: page number)||(Beck 2007: 55)|
|Author (Year: page number)||Beck (2007: 55)|
|Several authors||(Author1 and Author2 Year)||(Fitzenberger and Schulze 2013)|
|(Author1, Author2 and Author3 Year), then (Author1 et al. Year)||(Jones, Smith and Johnson 2017) , thereafter (Jones et al. 2017)|
|Multiple citations||(Author1 Year; Author2 Year)||(Beck 2007; Fitzenberger und Schulze 2013)|
In case of multiple authors the first author is written as “Surname, First name” whilst all following authors are written as “First name Surname”. (See journal example).
|Book||Surname, First name. Year. Title. City: Publisher.||Beck, Ulrich. 2007. Generation Global. Ein Crashkurs. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.|
|Journal||Surname, First name. Year. “Title”. Name of Journal. Volume number (issue number): page numbers||Fitzenberger, Bernd and Ute Schulze. 2013. “Up or out. Research incentives and career prospects of postdocs in Germany”. German Economic Review. 15(2): 287-328|
|Website||Surname, First name. Year. “Title”. City: Publisher. Retrieval date (URL).||Example: Bielefeld University. 2017. “14 zusätzliche Professuren für die Universität Bielefeld”. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University. Retrieved September 27, 2017 (https://ekvv.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/uniaktuell/entry/14_zusätzliche_professuren_für_die)|
Types of contributions
We accept a wide range of formats. The following is a suggestion for different types of contributions that we accept including a description and guideline for each. The guideline of roughly 15,000 characters for a scientific essay also applies to the other formats.
|Scientific Essay||13,000 – 18,000 characters (including spaces), which is around 1,500 words|
|Comics and cartoons|
|University group contribution|
This list is not exclusive. Other types are welcome as well.
Criteria for good essays
Distinction between an essay and a term paper:
Essays published in the sozusagen differ from term papers in several points:
- For scientific essays it is important to briefly explain ideas and concepts. However, it is not necessary to provide a complete overview of the state of the art. Therefore, you should manage with a select amount of scientific literature.
- To make your essays more accessible you should apply the concepts and theories to a specific example.
- Assume that not every reader has prior sociological knowledge. If you use technical terms, please explain them in an understandable way.
- You are not addressing an expert audience. Essays may be written in an interesting, amusing etc. manner.
- Feel free to take a look at essays in previous sozusagen issues for inspiration.
Ideally, your article fulfils the following content criteria and is structured accordingly:
- (empirical) hook, which clearly fits the question.
- Clear sociologically grounded question or hypothesis, that either results from the hook or leads to it
- Clear, comprehensible argumentation, which aims to answer the question (and not everything else at the same time). Common theme.
- Limited to a few theories: one or two sociological concepts (which must be cited!) are usually enough to answer a question.
- Illustrative examples.
- Finish with a conclusion that links back to the question, gives a summarised answer or raises new questions.
- Structure of the text: the question (according to the intended answers) is the basis for the structure of the text. It is the common theme.
- Not mandatory: subheadings (please do not use “introduction”, “main part”, “conclusion”) → not too many subheadings, they should be based on the content and be well structured
- Short and concise: Let your question and line of argumentation determine what is relevant and what is not. Try to avoid digressing from your question.
If your contribution is not in accordance with these guidelines please contact us. We will then investigate the objections for your contribution individually.